Sunday, August 13, 2006
So… one question… If we don’t negotiate with terrorists and Hizbollah is in effect a terrorist organization… why is there a cease fire starting on Monday? Don’t get me wrong, I understand the people at the table are actually Israel and Lebanon… but what’s the point of agreeing to a cease fire if the other group fighting isn’t at the negotiating table? Where and what is Hizbollah doing after the “so called” cease fire happens? Lebanon may agree to the halting of hostilities, but will the terrorists and are we just going to be right back at the beginning all over again? Is there anyone trying to mediate a cease fire between the world and Al-Qaeda or are we just eliminating them at all cost.
I say again… do we negotiate with terrorists?
My 2 cents worths for the night. We’ll have to wait and see.
«« previous Bush urges world leaders on the Mideast (AP via Yahoo! News)
next »» Bush Welcomes U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution (Fox News)


